Is managing a project where workers are remote, more or less challenging compared to co-located teams?

Behavior, Q&A

While physical proximity has certain advantages, doing business in a global economy with remote team members is an inescapable reality. As an independent consultant, with decades of managing distributed teams, I can tell you without hesitation interacting remotely is no more or less challenging than managing co-located people.

Does it require refining different skills? Yes. But competent PMs do that all the time.

In fact, with today’s technologies, managing remotely may offer certain advantages over co-location. Two items immediately come to mind: contemporaneous documentation and privacy.

Recording group sessions and generating written transcripts is much easier with each member occupying a discrete channel during a remote session. Likewise, private conversations are immune to the type of “gossip” or speculation that can occur when visual collaboration between team members is observed.

Embrace remote working – learn some new skills; it is the new normal.

 

Related Posts

CRISP™ 9-Easy Resource Allocation?

CRISP™ 9-Easy Resource Allocation?

Allocating work for employees who are most likely overburdened and quite possibly stressed out is a job ideally suited for Sisyphus. This post discusses an alternative approach that makes labor allocation easy.
CRISP™ 8-Baking In Accountability

CRISP™ 8-Baking In Accountability

Accountability is often defined and enforced as a part of governance codified in disparate documents. Discover how CRISP™ takes a different approach, baking-in all the facets accountability directly into the initiative execution process.