How do you resolve perfectionism issues in collaborative projects?

Behavior, Q&A

Not all “perfectionism issues” require resolution.

Team members who retard progress because of the desire to perfect non-critical deliverables should be given clear direction with respect to interdependencies and be time-boxed with respect to delivery. Endless analysis or discovery of business-related data is a common area where this behavior occurs.

On the other hand, a quality manager working on a collaborative team developing a medical device where anything less than perfection could result in death, should be rewarded for rejecting sub-standard results from team members. Collaboration does not always equal compromise.

Figure out which side of the “perfectionism spectrum” you find yourself and use the context to guide your actions.

Related Posts

CRISP™ 9-Easy Resource Allocation?

CRISP™ 9-Easy Resource Allocation?

Allocating work for employees who are most likely overburdened and quite possibly stressed out is a job ideally suited for Sisyphus. This post discusses an alternative approach that makes labor allocation easy.
CRISP™ 8-Baking In Accountability

CRISP™ 8-Baking In Accountability

Accountability is often defined and enforced as a part of governance codified in disparate documents. Discover how CRISP™ takes a different approach, baking-in all the facets accountability directly into the initiative execution process.